|
In partnership with
|
 |
|
|
This St. Patrick’s Day, everyone’s hunting for gold, but the IRS already knows where yours is.
|
|
|
|
|
-
📵 Scammers want you to panic and hand over gift cards. Here’s how to spot them in seconds.
-
💸 A new law lets tip workers deduct up to $25,000, but there’s a catch hiding in Box 12 of your W-2.
-
💰 The EITC could send you a refund check even if you owe nothing. See who qualifies.
-
🎲 In 1962, a Texas lawyer tried to write off a Vegas craps trip as a business expense. The IRS was not amused.
|
|
|
|
Follow us for even more great tips, tricks, and deadline reminders. Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn
|
IRS Survival Guide
|
📵 The IRS Will Never Ask for a Gift Card
|
 |
|
Image from Envato
|
|
|
The Quick & Bristly: Scammers impersonate the IRS with threats of arrest and demands for gift card payments, but the real IRS is slow, boring, and communicates almost exclusively by mail. If someone calls demanding immediate payment via gift card, crypto, or wire transfer, it’s a scam. Just hang up.
|
|
|
|
The phone rings right as you’re sitting down for dinner. The caller ID is a weird, unknown number, but you answer anyway.
|
|
A stern, robotic voice, or perhaps a very insistent man named “Agent Johnson,” informs you that you’ve committed tax fraud and the local police are on their way to your house at this very moment.
|
|
It’s a script designed to elicit one thing: sheer, blind panic. They want to scare you so badly that you forget to think.
|
|
But thinking is precisely what will save you.
|
The Real IRS is Gloriously, Predictably Boring
|
|
The secret to spotting a scammer is that they act nothing like the real IRS.
|
|
The real IRS is a bureaucracy of magnificent and glacial slowness. It runs on paper, procedures, and patience. It does not run on high-stakes threats and gift cards.
|
They Really, Truly Love the Mail
|
|
The IRS initiates almost all critical contacts, especially regarding issues such as audits or unpaid bills, through the U.S. Postal Service. You will get an official-looking envelope, probably several of them, long before you ever get a legitimate phone call from an agent about a debt.
|
|
The idea that they would call you out of the blue with a threat is, frankly, hilarious.
|
They Don’t Do High-Speed Threats
|
|
Real IRS agents don’t threaten to have you arrested “in the next 30 minutes” or deported. Now, this doesn’t mean they’ll never show up at your door. Unannounced visits from IRS agents are rare but very, very real. But the process of collecting taxes is a civil matter, not a high-speed police chase. Their most fearsome weapon is a form letter, not a pair of handcuffs.
|
Find out the four red flags that instantly reveal an IRS scammer, and exactly what to do if you get one of these calls. Keep reading →
|
|
|
PRESENTED BY THE FLYOVER
|
The News Source 2.3 Million Americans Trust More Than CNN
|
|
|
|
The Flyover cuts through the noise mainstream media refuses to clear.
|
|
No spin. No agenda. Just the day’s most important stories — politics, business, sports, tech, and more — delivered fast and free every morning.
|
|
Our editorial team combs hundreds of sources so you don’t have to spend your morning doom-scrolling.
|
|
Join 2.3 million Americans who start their day with facts, not takes.
|
|
Start Reading for Free
|
True or False: Gambling winnings are taxable income, but gambling losses are never deductible.
|
|
(Find the answer at the end of this newsletter)
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 101
|
💸 The Tax Credit That Pays You Back
|
 |
|
Image from Envato
|
|
|
The Quick & Bristly: The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is a refundable tax credit for working people with low-to-moderate income, meaning if the credit exceeds what you owe, the IRS actually sends you a check. The amount depends on your income, filing status, and whether you have qualifying children, but even childless workers can qualify.
|
|
|
|
Few things in life are certain, but the quiet dread that accompanies tax season is one of them. It’s a time for digging through receipts and staring at forms that look like architectural blueprints for a very confusing prison.
|
|
But buried in that labyrinth of tax code is something designed not to take your money, but to give some back. It’s called the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), and it’s basically the government’s way of giving a financial high-five to working folks.
|
|
The only catch? To get this high-five, you first have to solve a riddle wrapped in an enigma, sponsored by the IRS.
|
So, What in the World Is the Earned Income Tax Credit?
|
|
In simple terms, the EITC is a tax break for people with low-to-moderate earned income. “Earned income” is the key phrase. It’s money you get from working a job, either for someone else or for yourself. This isn’t for lottery winnings or that suspiciously large check from Aunt Mildred.
|
|
What makes the EITC the star of the tax credit world is that it’s refundable. Most tax credits can only reduce your tax bill to zero. A refundable credit is a different beast entirely. If the credit is bigger than the tax you owe, the IRS doesn’t just call it even. They actually send you the leftover amount as a refund.
|
|
This is how some families end up with a “negative tax burden,” meaning they get more back from the system than they paid in.
|
The Great Qualification Quest: Are You One of the Chosen Ones?
|
|
This is where things get a bit complicated. The IRS has a set of rules that can feel a little tricky, but they’re manageable when you break them down.
|
The Basic Rules of the Club
|
|
First, everyone who wants to claim the EITC has to meet some ground rules.
|
-
You must have earned income (duh).
-
Your investment income must be below the annual limit (the IRS sets this each year).
-
You, your spouse, and any qualifying children need valid Social Security Numbers.
-
You can’t use the “Married Filing Separately” status.
-
You must be a U.S. citizen or a resident alien for the whole year.
|
The All-Important “Qualifying Child”
|
|
The size of your credit is hugely dependent on whether you have a “qualifying child.” The IRS has a precise definition for this, and your child must pass four tests, like some kind of tiny tax-law Olympian.
|
-
Relationship: The child must be your son, daughter, stepchild, foster child, sibling, or a descendant of any of them (like a grandchild or nephew).
-
Age: The child must be under 19, or a full-time student under 24, or any age if they are permanently and totally disabled.
-
Residency: The child must have lived with you in the U.S. for more than half the year.
-
Joint Return: The child cannot have filed a joint return with a spouse (unless it was only to get a refund).
|
|
If a child qualifies as a dependent of more than one person (common with separated parents), “tie-breaker” rules usually give the credit to the parent the child lived with the longest.
|
Flying Solo: Qualifying Without Children
|
|
No kids? You can still qualify for the EITC, though the credit is smaller. You generally must be between the ages of 25 and 65, live in the U.S. for more than half the year, and not be claimed as a dependent on someone else’s return.
|
|
Find out how to actually claim this credit, and the simple mistakes that could get you banned from it for years. Keep reading →
|
|
|
Good Credit Could Save You $200,000 Over Time
|
|
|
|
Better credit means better rates on mortgages, cars, and more. Cheers Credit Builder is an affordable, AI-powered way to start — no score or hard check required. We report to all three bureaus fast. Many users see 20+ point increases in months. Cancel anytime with no penalties or hidden fees.
|
|
Start Building Credit Today
|
Wild Tax Tales
|
🎲 The Gambler Who Tried to Beat the IRS
|
 |
|
Image by Andres M.
|
|
|
The Quick & Bristly: In 1962, Texas attorney J.P. Sanford tried to write off a Las Vegas craps trip as a business expense, and lost in Tax Court. The IRS and the judge agreed: no records, no business plan, and a day job as a lawyer meant his gambling was a hobby, not a trade. Lesson learned. You can’t bluff the IRS.
|
|
|
|
J.P. Sanford, a Texas attorney, went to Las Vegas in 1962 with a plan. He believed he had a system to turn the game of craps into a profitable enterprise. Like any aspiring businessman, he also thought he was entitled to deduct his expenses.
|
|
After a trip spent at the craps tables, he tallied up his travel, food, and lodging costs to $571.20*. He then claimed the entire amount as a business deduction on his tax return.
|
|
*Based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) data from the Bureau of Labor Satistics, J.P. Sanford’s $571.20 deduction in 1962 would be equivalent to approximately $6,152.46 in 2026.
|
The IRS Calls His Bluff
|
|
Sanford’s reasoning was simple: he argued he was in the “trade or business of gambling,” which made his trip a necessary professional expense. The IRS, deeply skeptical of such remarkable optimism, saw a lawyer on vacation. They promptly disallowed the deduction, classifying the trip as a personal expense and his gambling as, at best, a hobby.
|
|
But Sanford was an attorney who believed in his argument. He was willing to fight for his deduction, and so this dispute over a $571 trip ended up in the U.S. Tax Court.
|
Business or Hobby? A Billion-Dollar Question
|
|
The case boiled down to one of the most fundamental questions in tax law: what separates a business from a hobby?
|
|
The answer determines whether your expenses are deductible. The court looks past a taxpayer’s stated intentions and examines the cold, hard facts. The judge asked a series of practical questions:
|
-
Did Sanford conduct his gambling in a businesslike manner?
-
Did he maintain complete and accurate books and records of his wins and losses?
-
Did he have a business plan or a separate bank account for this “business”?
-
Was his primary source of income from gambling or his law practice?
|
|
Of course, scrutinizing gambling profits was nothing new for the government. Learn all you need to know about what happens to your winnings. (You can read that full article here.)
|
The Verdict: A Losing Hand
|
|
On all of these fronts, Sanford’s case crumbled. He had kept no credible, businesslike records. He was a full-time attorney, and his income came from his law practice, not the casino. The judge concluded his actions were indistinguishable from those of any other hopeful tourist trying their luck.
|
|
The court ruled decisively in favor of the IRS: the gambling was a hobby, the trip was a personal vacation, and the deduction was denied.
|
|
The Sanford case is a timeless lesson. The tax code makes a clear distinction between a business and a hobby, and simply wanting to make money isn’t enough to cross that line. Today, professional poker players successfully deduct travel expenses, but they also keep meticulous records and treat it as a full-time job. They can prove they are running a business.
|
|
Mr. Sanford couldn’t. He had the dream, but he didn’t have the receipts, and in the eyes of the Tax Court, that makes all the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The quick (and slightly prickly) stories we didn’t have time to get to:
|
|
|
|
If you made it this far, you’re our kind of nerd. Hit reply and tell us which story you want us to dive deeper into next week.
|
|
|
|
|
Answer: ❌ False!
|
|
You can deduct gambling losses, but only up to the amount of your winnings, and only if you itemize.
|
|
|
|
|
|